InventorEd, Inc. Presents:
The
Burdick Law Story
This page is
dedicated to Bruce Burdick. InventorEd
honors Mr. Burdick for his community service and
personal commitment and sacrifice on behalf of
inventors.
|
PLEASE
Support InventorEd Your Donation Helps
|
Invention
Submission Corporation brought a SLAPP
suit against Bruce Burdick to force
this information off of the web. It
was no accident that they picked on a
sole practioner who lacked the resources
to stop a big company like ISC from
abridging his First Amendment
rights and the public's right to this
information. InventorEd
obtained permission to use this
information early on as a protective
measure in the event that Mr. Burdick had
to settle the case.
|
 ISC
wants Your Business
Fewer
Than One in 500 ISC Clients make more
money than they paid ISC !!
|
BEWARE:
InventHELP.com
is ISC's new home and name.
InventHELP.com
offers a free book "How We Work" The
story of how they work is available on the FTC
web site at: http://search.ftc.gov/query.html?qt=invention+submission
|
Presenting the
Web Page ISC Wanted Censored:
(Orange Background) |
Scammed?
Here is how to complain
In
Missouri, there is a complaint form
you can use to alert the Attorney General to
scams.
|
Red
Flag List for Inventors
(list
of warning signs about scams)
|
Who
is behind Invention Submission Corporation
MARTIN S BERGER
Who
is behind Universal Finance Corporation?
MARTIN S BERGER
To quote the Federal Trade Commission:
The FTC's complaint detailing its
allegations also names Western Invention
Submission Corporation (WISC), Intromark
Incorporated, and the parent company of all three,
Technosystems Consolidated Corporation (TCC); as
well as Martin S. Berger, who is the sole officer
and director of the firms (collectively, ISC).
All of the defendants are located in Pittsburgh.
To Quote ISCs hometown TV station
"We made many false promises, many
false promises," said Kimberly, another
former ISC employee who asked Team 4 to conceal
her identity. "I mean, it was common
practice on a daily basis for us to let these
people keep hoping and wishing and dreaming. We
were thriving on their wants. WTAE
-Pittsburgh TV Channel 4,
NOTE: We do not
assert that the FTC or Pittsburgh Channel 4
statements are accurate, just that they exist,
and that their existence should make every
inventor very skeptical in dealing with ISC.-burdlaw.com
|
INVENTOR
GROUPS
before sending
money to ISC, or any similar company,
contact one of these. Inventor Groups are
on your side.
They
can help you avoid being scammed.
United
Inventors Association of the USApublisher
of Inventor Digest and tireless advocate of
rights of independent inventor.
National
Conference of Inventor Organizations
Illinois
Innovators and Inventors, Inc. (meets
monthly in Edwardsville, IL)
|
INTROMARK
Affiliated with Invention Submission Corproation
CEO Martin S. Berger Indicted
by the FTC for fraud,
now operating under settlement agreement with FTC,
see below
|
Western
Invention Submission Corporation CEO
& Treasurer, Martin S. Berger
This company is the one that purports to be the
licensing company portion of the Berger empire |
TECHNOSYSTEMS
CONSOLIDATED CORPORATION CEO - Martin S.
Berger, apparently the parent company of
Invention Submission Corporation, Intromark, and
Western Invention Submission Corporation. Charged
by the FTC for fraud,
but paid $1,200,000 and is operating under a
Settlement Agreement
|
Universal
Finance Company, Inc. Secretary &
Treasurer Martin S. Berger Bob
Amic is a former employee of ISC -- the company
that said Parsons' phone hat was a good idea.
"It's all about making sure we get the
money and keep the money," Amic said. "There
were a lot of people who didn't have a lot of
education who got talked into doing these kind of
things with the hope that they were going to hit
it and they didn't hit it, and they couldn't make
the mortgage payments and they were worried about
paying money to Universal Finance. That's
a problem. It was morally repugnant to me, quite
frankly." WTAE
-Pittsburgh TV Channel 4,
.
|
TECHNOSERVICE
SERVICE CORPORATION another
Martin S. Berger corporation |
INPEX
Claims itself to be THE WORLD'S
LARGEST
INVENTION/NEW PRODUCT EXPOSITION!But,
alas it is run by Invention Submission
Corporation.
ISC
says: INPEX® provides an ideal
forum for inventors, entrepreneurs or
intellectual property owners to exhibit their
inventions and try to make contacts with
companies interested in new products.
See the other boxes on this page might help
you gain an insight as to which companies ISC
might mean.and whether they would be of any help
to you.
Remember
Lincoln?
You
can fool some of the people all of the time and
all of the people some of the time, but you
cant fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln
Abraham
Lincoln was the only President to ever receive a
patent.
|
Read this before doing business
with one of Martin S. Bergers companies. .
.
Since 1984, according to the complaint, the
defendants have sold a variety of invention
promotion services to individual inventors in
stages. First, the defendants allegedly
offer to prepare a "Basic Information
Package" concerning the idea or product for
$395 to $590. In the second stage, the
defendants offer to provide certain marketing and
licensing services under a "Submission
Agreement" at a cost ranging from $3450 to $4890,
the complaint states. Third, ISC provides
any leads it may receive on a client's idea to
Intromark, which allegedly attempts to negotiate
a license for the idea or invention, with clients
agreeing to share a percentage of any payments as
a result of ISC's services. (Additionally,
ISC and WISC offer clients with more fully
developed ideas a separate service called the
"Market Supplement Program," for
approximately $12,500.) The defendants
allegedly have promoted and advertised their
services on television and radio and in
newspapers and magazines across the country, as
well as through telephone and in-person sales
presentations.
The FTC charged that the defendants have made
numerous false representations in the course of
selling these services. Among them, the
complaint alleges, were representations that the
defendants' services have resulted in financial
gain for their "Basic Information Package"
and "Submission Agreement" customers,
and that their clients have a reasonable
expectation of realizing financial gain as a
result of their services. Neither
representation was true, according to the
complaint.
FTC
PRESS RELEASE APRIL 20, 1993
The Commission vote to file the complaint was
5-0.
What was the result of that FTC Complaint?
Invention Submission Corporation of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, has agreed to pay $1.2
millionfor consumer redress as part of a
settlement of Federal Trade Commission charges it
misrepresented the nature, quality, and success
rate of the invention promotion services it sold
to consumers.
The proposed consent decree to settle these
charges would permanently prohibit ISC from
misrepresenting its background and experience in
the invention promotion field, as well as any
material aspect of its services or business
practices.
FTC
PRESS RELEASE FEBRUARY 7, 1994
Webmaster: Bruce
E. Burdick | webmaster@burdlaw.com
|

Have you been Scammed? Find
out what to do here.
Please Notify Us Of Any Errors Of Fact - Click ErrorOfFact

Return to The ISC Main Page
Site Index - Contact
Us - © InventorEd, Inc., Page
last revised 12-24-2005
 Unhappy
Customer
|
 $10,000
to $20,000 Wasted money
Source FTC Jodie
Bernstein
|
|