InventorEd, Inc. Presents:

Invention Promoter 
Caution List

Click here to break out of Frame

PLEASE Support InventorEd

Your Donation Helps

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Docket as listed, sections of most interest coded in red and bold to make them easy to find.

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

U.S. District Court

District of South Dakota (Southern Div)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-4087

Natl Inventor Fraud, et al v. Invention Submission, et al

Filed: 05/06/99
Assigned to: Lawrence L. Piersol
Jury demand: Both
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 470
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)


NATIONAL INVENTOR FRAUD CENTER,   Matthew S. McCaulley
INC., a North Dakota              [COR LD NTC]
Corporation                       Hynes & McCaulley
     plaintiff                    122 S. Phillips Ave.
                                  Suite 250
                                  Sioux Falls, SD 57104
                                  332-0500
NEUSTEL LAW OFFICES, LTD., a      Matthew S. McCaulley
North Dakota Professional         (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     plaintiff
MICHAEL S. NEUSTEL,               Matthew S. McCaulley
Individually                      (See above)
     plaintiff                    [COR LD NTC]
SHANNON L. NEUSTEL,               Matthew S. McCaulley
Individually                      (See above)
     plaintiff                    [COR LD NTC]
   v.
INVENTION SUBMISSION              Gary P. Thimsen
CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania       [COR LD NTC]
Corporation                       Woods, Fuller, Shultz & Smith,
     defendant                    PC
                                  PO Box 5027
                                  Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5027
                                  336-3890
                                  FTS 339-3357
WESTERN INVENTION SUBMISSION      Gary P. Thimsen
CORPORATION, a Tennessee          (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     defendant
INTROMARK INCORPORATED, a         Gary P. Thimsen
Pennsylvania Corporation          (See above)
     defendant                    [COR LD NTC]
TECHNOSYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED        Gary P. Thimsen
CORPORATION, a Delaware           (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     defendant
MARTIN S. BERGER, Individually    Gary P. Thimsen
     defendant                    (See above)
                                  [COR LD NTC]
KAARDAL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., a     Gary P. Thimsen
South Dakota Professional         (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     defendant
IVAR M. KAARDAL, Individually     Gary P. Thimsen
     defendant                    (See above)
                                  [COR LD NTC]
FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN, a            Gary P. Thimsen
Pennsylvania Professional         (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     defendant
EDWARD B. FRIEDMAN,               Gary P. Thimsen
Individually                      (See above)
     defendant                    [COR LD NTC]
WASHINGTON PATENT SERVICES,       Gary P. Thimsen
INC., a Florida Corporation       (See above)
dba                               [COR LD NTC]
Ecosearch Corporation
     defendant
ABOVE BOARD DRAFTING              Gary P. Thimsen
INCORPORATED, a Florida           (See above)
Corporation                       [COR LD NTC]
     defendant
BARBARA D. FERRELL,               Gary P. Thimsen
Individually                      (See above)
     defendant                    [COR LD NTC]
DONALD E. FERRELL,                Gary P. Thimsen
Individually                      (See above)
     defendant                    [COR LD NTC]


DOCKET     PROCEEDINGS



DATE     #                   DOCKET     ENTRY

5/6/99   1       COMPLAINT: no summons(es) issued  to plaintiff's counsel;
                 jury demand  (plaintiff's attorney states action will not
                 be served at this time) (jm) [Entry date 05/07/99]
5/6/99   --      FILING FEE PAID: on 5/6/99  in the amount of $ 150.00,
                 receipt # 0020757. (jm) [Entry date 05/07/99]
5/6/99   2       CIVIL COVER SHEET (jm) [Entry date 05/07/99]
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Washington Patent, defendant
                 Above Board Drafting (handed two true copies to plaintiff's
                 counsel) (jm)
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Barbara D. Ferrell,
                 defendant Donald E. Ferrell (handed two true copies to
                 plaintiff's counsel) (jm)
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Edward B. Friedman (handed
                 one true copy of summons to plaintiff's counsel) (jm)
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems (handed four true copies of summons
                 to plaintiff's consel) (jm)
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Martin S. Berger (handed one
                 true copy to plaintiff's counsel) (jm)
6/17/99  --      SUMMONS issued as to defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant
                 Ivar M. Kaardal (handed one true copy to plaintiff's
                 counsel) (jm)
7/2/99   3       MOTION/Stipulation to extend time to answer by plaintiff,
                 defendant (sl) [Entry date 07/06/99]
7/2/99   4       ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol granting  motion to extend
                 time to answer  [3-1]  (cc:all counsel) (sl)
                 [Entry date 07/06/99]
7/6/99   --      PRO HAC VICE letter sent to  Edward B. Friedman (sl)
7/8/99   5       MOTION to exceed page limitation by defendant Invention
                 Submission, defendant Western Invention, defendant
                 Intromark Inc, defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S.
                 Berger, defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M.
                 Kaardal, defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman, defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above
                 Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant
                 Donald E. Ferrell (pb)
7/14/99  6       ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol granting  motion to exceed
                 page limitation [5-1]; brief shall not exceed 35 pages
                 (cc:all counsel) (pb)
7/14/99  7       MOTION to dismiss Complaint by defendant Invention
                 Submission, defendant Western Invention, defendant
                 Intromark Inc, defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S.
                 Berger, defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M.
                 Kaardal, defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above Board
                 Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant Donald E.
                 Ferrell (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/14/99  8       MEMORANDUM/BRIEF by defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger,
                 defendant & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant
                 Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B. Friedman,
                 defendant Patent, defendant Above Board Drafting, defendant
                 Barbara Ferrell, defendant Donald E. Ferrell in support of
                 motion dismiss Complaint [7-1] (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/14/99  9       AFFIDAVIT of Pamela L. Gibeau in support of Motion to
                 Dismiss [7-1] (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/14/99  10      AFFIDAVIT of Edward B. Friedman in support of Motion to
                 Dismiss [7-1] (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/14/99  11      AFFIDAVIT of Gary P. Thimsen in support of Motion to
                 Dismiss [7-1] (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/14/99  12      CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger,
                 defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal,
                 defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman, defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above
                 Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant
                 Donald E. Ferrell (pb) [Entry date 07/15/99]
7/15/99  --      See VOLUME 2 (sl) [Entry date 07/28/99]
7/26/99  --      VOLUME 2 (sl) [Entry date 07/28/99]
7/27/99  13      MOTION for order to approve brief filed 7/14/99 by
                 defendant (sl) [Entry date 07/28/99]
7/27/99  14      MOTION to strike defendants' brief in support of its
                 motion to dismiss that exceed page limitation by plaintiff
                 (sl) [Entry date 07/28/99]
8/2/99   15      MOTION to extend time to file answer, motion, responsive
                 pleading until 8/13/99 by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud,
                 plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel (pb) [Entry date 08/03/99]
8/2/99   16      JOINT MOTION/STIPULATION to extend time to file answer,
                 motion, or other responsive pleading until 8/13/99 by
                 plaintiffs, (pb) [Entry date 08/03/99]
                 [Edit date 08/03/99]
8/2/99   17      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Donald E. Ferrell
                 on 6/22/99 (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   18      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Barbara D.
                 Ferrell on 6/22/99 (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   19      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Above Board
                 Drafting on 6/22/99 (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   20      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Kaardal & Assoc,
                 defendant Ivar M. Kaardal on 6/18/99 (jm)
                 [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   21      SUMMONS (DEFENDANT(S) Kaardal & Associates & Ivar M.
                 Kaardal SERVED) (jm) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   22      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Washington Patent
                 on 6/24/99 (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   23      SUMMONS (DEFENDANT(S) Donald E. Ferrell and Barbara D.
                 Ferrell SERVED) (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/2/99   24      SUMMONS (DEFENDANT(S) Washington Patent and Above Board
                 Drafting SERVED) (pb) [Entry date 08/04/99]
8/11/99  25      ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol granting  motion to strike
                 defendants' brief in support of its motion to dismiss that
                 exceed page limitation [14-1] [8-1] striking memorandum
                 [8-1] denying motion for order to approve brief filed
                 7/14/99 [13-1] granting  motion (to the extent that
                 plaintiffs will comply with Local Rule 7.2 by filing
                 responsive brief within 20 days after service of
                 defendants' brief that is filed and served in compliance
                 with this Order, and defendants may then file/serve any
                 reply within 20 days after service of plaintiffs' brief) to
                 extend time to file answer, motion, responsive pleading
                 until 8/13/99 [15-1]; defendants to file/serve brief in
                 support of motion to dismiss with 35 page limitation no
                 later than 14 days after entry of this Order (cc:all
                 counsel) (pb) [Entry date 08/12/99]
8/23/99  26      MEMORANDUM by defendant Invention Submission, defendant
                 Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc, defendant
                 Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant
                 Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant
                 Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B. Friedman,
                 defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above Board
                 Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant Donald E.
                 Ferrell in support of motion to dismiss Complaint [7-1] (jm)
                 [Entry date 08/24/99]
8/23/99  27      CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger,
                 defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal,
                 defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman, defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above
                 Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant
                 Donald E. Ferrell (jm) [Entry date 08/24/99]
9/1/99   28      AMENDED RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Kaardal &
                 Assoc on 6/17/99 (SM) [Entry date 09/02/99]
9/1/99   29      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Ivar M. Kaardal
                 on 6/22/99 (SM) [Entry date 09/02/99]
9/2/99   30      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Invention
                 Submission, defendant Western Invention, defendant
                 Intromark Inc, defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S.
                 Berger on 6/23/99 (pb) [Entry date 09/03/99]
9/2/99   31      RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Friedman &
                 Friedman, defendant Edward B. Friedman on 6/24/99 (pb)
                 [Entry date 09/03/99]
9/13/99  32      MOTION to Amend Complaint by plaintiff Natl Inventor
                 Fraud, plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 Neustel, plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel (lz)
                 [Entry date 09/14/99]
9/13/99  33      MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud, plaintiff
                 Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S. Neustel,
                 plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel in opposition to motion to
                 dismiss Complaint [7-1] (lz) [Entry date 09/14/99]
9/20/99  34      MOTION/Stipulation to extend filing date to file motion
                 by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud, plaintiff Neustel Law
                 Offices, plaintiff Michael S. Neustel, plaintiff Shannon L.
                 Neustel, defendant Invention Submission, defendant Western
                 Invention, defendant Inc, defendant Technosystems,
                 defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant Kaardal & Assoc,
                 defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant Friedman & Friedman,
                 defendant Edward B. defendant Washington Patent, defendant
                 Above Board defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant Donald
                 E. Ferrell (SM) [Entry date 09/23/99]
9/23/99  35      ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol granting  motion for leave to
                 Amend Complaint [32-1]; Amended Complaint may be filed;
                 defendants to file Motion to Dismiss or other response by
                 10/14/99; defendants may file brief in support of Motion to
                 Dismiss not to exceed 35 pages; (cc:all counsel) (pb)
9/23/99  36      AMENDED COMPLAINT (with exhibit attachments) [1-1] by
                 plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud, plaintiff Neustel Law
                 Offices, plaintiff Michael S. plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel;
                 jury demand (in expando) (pb)
9/23/99  37      CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud,
                 plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 Neustel, plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel (pb)
10/13/99 38      MOTION to dismiss amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)
                  by defendant Invention Submission, defendant Western
                 Invention, defendant Intromark Inc, defendant
                 Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant
                 Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant
                 Washington Patent, defendant Above Board defendant Barbara
                 D. Ferrell, defendant Donald E. Ferrell (SM)
                 [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 39      MEMORANDUM by defendant Invention Submission, defendant
                 Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc, defendant
                 Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant
                 Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant
                 Washington Patent, defendant Above Board Drafting,
                 defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant Donald E. Ferrell
                 in support of motion to dismiss amended complaint pursuant
                 to FRCP 12(b) [38-1] (SM) [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 40      MOTION to dismiss amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)
                  by defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman (SM) [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 41      MEMORANDUM by defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant
                 Edward B. Friedman in support of motion to dismiss amended
                 complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [40-1] (SM)
                 [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 42      AFFIDAVIT of Edward B. Friedman in support of motion to
                 dismiss amended complaint [40-1] (SM) [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 43      AFFIDAVIT of Ivar M. Kaardal in support of motion to
                 dismiss amended complaint [38-1] (SM) [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/13/99 44      CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger,
                 defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal,
                 defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman, defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above
                 Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant
                 Donald E. Ferrell (SM) [Entry date 10/14/99]
10/22/99 45      MOTION to strike defendant's brief by plaintiff Natl
                 Inventor Fraud, plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff
                 Michael S. plaintiff Shannon L. Neustel (SM)
                 [Entry date 10/25/99]
10/22/99 46      MEMORANDUM/Brief by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud,
                 plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 Neustel, Shannon L. Neustel in support of motion to strike
                 defendant's brief [45-1] (SM) [Entry date 10/25/99]
10/28/99 47      ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol denying motion to strike
                 defendant's brief [45-1]; plaintiffs may file responses to
                 each brief filed on 10/13/99; plaintiffs may have 15 pages
                 to respond to Friedman defendants' brief and 35 pages to
                 respond to remaining briefs; defendants may file separate
                 reply briefs not to exceed 10 pages for the Friedman reply
                 brief and 15 pages for the remaining defendants' reply
                 brief (cc:all counsel) (SM) [Entry date 10/29/99]
11/2/99  48      MEMORANDUM/Brief by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud,
                 plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 Neustel, Shannon L. Neustel in opposition to motion to
                 dismiss amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [38-1] (SM)
                 [Entry date 11/04/99]
11/2/99  49      MEMORANDUM/Brief by plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud,
                 plaintiff Neustel Law Offices, plaintiff Michael S.
                 Neustel, Shannon L. Neustel in opposition to motion to
                 dismiss amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [40-1] (SM)
                 [Entry date 11/04/99]
11/2/99  50      AFFIDAVIT of Michael S. Neustel (SM) [Entry date 11/04/99]
11/10/99 51      REPLY BRIEF by defendant Invention Submission, defendant
                 Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc, defendant
                 defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant Kaardal & Assoc,
                 defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant Washington Patent,
                 defendant Above Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D.
                 Ferrell, defendant Donald E. Ferrell to response to motion
                 to dismiss amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [38-1]
                 (pb) [Entry date 11/12/99]
11/10/99 52      REPLY BRIEF by defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant
                 Edward B. Friedman to response to motion to dismiss amended
                 pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [40-1] (pb) [Entry date 11/12/99]
11/10/99 53      AFFIDAVIT of James I. Smith, III in support of defendants'
                 motion to dismiss amended complaint [40-1] (pb)
                 [Entry date 11/12/99]
11/10/99 54      SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT of Edward B. Friedman by defendant
                 Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B. Friedman re
                 affidavit [42-1] (pb) [Entry date 11/12/99]
11/10/99 55      CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Invention Submission,
                 defendant Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc,
                 defendant Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger,
                 defendant Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal,
                 defendant Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B.
                 Friedman, defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above
                 Board Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant
                 Donald E. Ferrell (pb) [Entry date 11/12/99]
11/29/99 56      MOTION for protective order postponing deposition of Ron
                 Brown for failure to comply with federal rules and
                 requiring disclosure of facts and exhibits prior to
                 deposition by defendant Invention Submission, defendant
                 Western Invention, defendant Intromark Inc, defendant
                 Technosystems, defendant Martin S. Berger, defendant
                 Kaardal & Assoc, defendant Ivar M. Kaardal, defendant
                 Friedman & Friedman, defendant Edward B. Friedman,
                 defendant Washington Patent, defendant Above Board
                 Drafting, defendant Barbara D. Ferrell, defendant Donald E.
                 Ferrell (sl) [Entry date 11/30/99]
11/29/99 --      See VOLUME 3 (sl) [Entry date 11/30/99]
11/30/99 --      VOLUME 3 (sl)
11/30/99 57      MOTION for order denying defendant's motion for a
                 protective order postponing the Deposition of Ron Brown,
                 and for leave to take deposition of Ron Brown by
                 plaintiff Natl Inventor Fraud, plaintiff Neustel Law
                 Offices, plaintiff Michael S. Neustel, plaintiff Shannon L.
                 Neustel (ds) [Entry date 12/02/99]
11/30/99 58      MINUTES  RE: motion hearing before the Hon. Mark F.
                 Marshall, Magistrate Judge, Sioux Falls, SD (ds)
                 [Entry date 12/02/99]
12/2/99  59      ORDER by Mag Judge Mark F. Marshall denying motion for
                 order denying defendant's motion for a protective order
                 postponing the Deposition of Ron Brown [57-1], denying
                 motion for leave to take deposition of Ron Brown [57-2],
                 granting  motion for protective order postponing deposition
                 of Ron Brown for failure to comply with federal rules and
                 requiring disclosure of facts and exhibits prior to
                 deposition [56-1] (cc:all counsel) (ds)
2/17/00  60      MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol
                 granting in part and denying in part motion to dismiss
                 amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [40-1] granting in
                 part and denying in part motion to dismiss amended
                 complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b) [38-1]; claims brought by
                 plaintiffs in Section V of Amended Complaint pursuant to
                 RICO will not be dismissed for lack of personal
                 jurisdiction over defendants Edward Friedman or Friedman
                 and Friedman; nor will claims be dismissed for failure to
                 state claim; Court dismisses without prejudice counts for
                 Declaratory Judgment as stated in Sections VI and VII of
                 Amended Complaint; Court dismisses without prejudice count
                 for Abuse of Process as stated in Section IX of Amended
                 Complaint; claims remaining in suit are those brought under
                 Lanham Act (Section IV of Amended Complaint), under RICO
                 (Section V of Amended Complaint), and for breach of
                 contract (Section VII of Amended Complaint)  (cc: all
                 counsel) (pb) [Entry date 02/18/00]
2/28/00  61      MOTION/STIPULATION to extend date to file answers to
                 amended complaint by plaintiff, defendant (sl)
                 [Entry date 02/29/00]
3/2/00   62      ORDER by Lawrence L. Piersol granting  motion to extend
                 date to file answers to amended complaint [61-1]  (cc:all
                 counsel) (jm) [Entry date 03/03/00]
3/28/00  63      CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Lawrence L. Piersol
                 dismissing case with prejudice, each party to bear its
                 own costs and attorney fees, settlement agreement to be
                 filed with clerk and sealed (cc:all counsel) (sl)
3/28/00  64      SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE by plaintiff,
                 defendant (seal)


Case Flags:
TERMED


END OF DOCKET: 4:99cv4087

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Have you been Scammed? Find out what to do here.
Please Notify Us Of Any Errors Of Fact - Click ErrorOfFact

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Site Index - Contact Us - InventorEd, Inc., Page last revised 2-5-2005

Smiley face which turns to a frown

Unhappy Customer

Wallet with money flying away

$10,000 to $20,000 Wasted money

Source FTC Jodie Bernstein