Special Page for Archer Quinn - AKA Kevin Thomas Click here to break out of Frame Please Notify Us Of Any Errors Of Fact
- Click ErrorOfFact Patently Dishonest? - Have you been Scammed? Find out what to do here.
hwww.InventorEd.org/caution/archer-quinn/ personal profile, self described occupation "bum". http://www.kftv.com/company-11205911.html http://www.producers-source.com/bulletin/index2d.html Attempt to sell script.
----- Original Message -----
From: Archer
Quinn
To: info@rjriley.net
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:26 PM
Subject: This is a link to our site
We have a section in cool links in the Launch kit,
if you would like a free listing in the kit please let us know.
Archer Quinn
CEO
The New Da Vincis
==== When Archer Quinn AKA Kevin Thomas did not get the rapid response he felt he was entitled to he fired off the following message. ====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
To: <dpressman@InventorEd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: Patent it yourself?
studied law and am conversant with patent and copyright laws, our primary help is in the product design and marketing fields, no, don't panic, we are advisory only and do not ever become involved in project of clients even if offered. I would be interested in listing a link for your book when it is digitally available online. As for inved.org they seem to tar everyone with the same brush, our firm as do some others, guide people through the steps without percentages and commissions, And if you see our site, it is the only absolute privacy G'tee site in the world, we don't want to know the full details without provisional protection, we simply help with component design when stuck, or provide references for them to find suppliers of products and then how to market, all written in English, not in holier than thou technical speak. www.thenewdavincis.com Regards Archer Quinn ====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
To: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: Patent it yourself?
I have checked both the US and Australia's patent database and as far as I can tell you hold no patents. There is no history of your contributing to the inventor community in any way. A background check only shows that you have a small presence in the entertainment industry. Other then your web site I see no evidence that you have any expertise. The web site is more glitz then substance. In your first communication you make disparaging remarks about InventorEd. At this point I have no reason to believe that you are anything other then another smooth talking promoter who sees aspiring inventors as easy marks. Everything about the way you have conducted yourself sets off alarm bells. In light of your conduct and the fact that you are trying to elicit $100 from clients in North America for services which are at best of dubious value, I have added your name to the lowest level of caution list, I.e. the "watch list". If we receive complaints from clients and they are unresolved it will cause you to be moved to the "extreme caution" list. Conversely, if you actually produce verifiable success stories it may result in your name being removed from the caution lists. You need to understand that we frequently see brash, pushy, arrogant sales types decide that inventors are easy marks and a source of easy money. Ronald J Riley www.InventorEd.org ====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
To: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Patent it yourself?
generation A list actress owns another. My personal not company!! income for 1992 was 1.2m taxable income. What was yours clever. What you don't know about inventors as you are clearly not one, is that all true inventors have great imaginations and are usually actors, writers, Sculptors Etc, clearly your book will be worthless for you have no understanding of the people with whom you deal. I am skilled in chemistry and physics, I could teach you how to make your soap explode when having a shower ,to how to make a million from coca cola with a simple marketing trick. I doubt you could teach anything.. I will be sure to pass on your name in the context which belies your conduct. Have a nice day ====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
To: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: Patent it yourself?
====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
To: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2004 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: Patent it yourself?
funny. I reviewed your site and it is a commercial web site seeking $100 memberships. It is light on information. A background check shows that you are also trying to peddle scripts. And doing so by placing ads on forums. I hate to tell you this, but if you do not know how to contact people in a position to buy your scripts I very much doubt you know how to contact people and sell them inventions, much less teach inventors to do this. I will pass your communication on to Mr. Pressman along with the results of my research. Ronald J Riley www.InventorEd.org ==== ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
To: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: Patent it yourself?
----- Original Message ----- ====
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin
Thomas
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 1:33 AM
Subject: Remove it or unlike everyone else I will sue
you, for damages to Character and business
You have 24hrs to comply, withdrawal after that point
will not constitute compliance simply a defiance of the liability laws
to see how far you could go, and as such confirms an act of malice.
Black lists for your information are illegal. I am advising you to
seek legal advice to verify such so that in the event the list stays,
you will also be subject to criminal not civil prosecution.
Archer Quinn
====
----- Original Message -----
From: "Archer quinn" <archerquinn@dodo.com.au>
To: "Ronald J Riley (InvEd)" <Ron@InvEd.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 2:20 AM
Subject: Legal action will be filed with the US
public prosecuters Office Tuesday Morning
The Law Defamation Generally What is defamatory? Libel and Slander distinguished Meaning of 'Permanent form" Requirement of Publication Examples on the Internet are: Defenses O'Brien v. Brown; Manawatu Internet Services,
Palmerston Northern Dist. Court (New Zealand, 2001). A New Zealand
court awarded $42,000 against a website contributor for defamation. The
court found Manawatu Internet Service director Alan Brown liable for
defamation for posting on the web statements critical of Domainaz, a
central domain name registry service. The court noted that freedom of
expression was no greater on the Internet than in other publications.
The court awarded $30,000 for general damages and a further $12,000 for
puntive damages. Article at www.nzherald.co.nz ====
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronald
J Riley (InvEd)
To: Kevin
Thomas
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Remove it or unlike everyone else I will
sue you, for damages to Character and business
Mr. Quinn,
You contacted me, and you made disparaging remarks
about our organization in the mistaken belief that you were contacting
one of our directors rather then us.
So are you Archer Quinn or Kevin Thomas? Using
two names, um....I guess that caution is in order.
You have made one blunder after another. Now to
be fair to you I will create a mini-section and post all of our
correspondence so that your views on the matter get equal exposure.
I will try to post all you comments by Monday.
This is standard operating procedure for
InventorEd. There is a posted publication policy on the site which
spells this out. There is also a posted policy on every caution
page, and in light of your first communication to us it is clear that
you read some of those pages.
Getting back to the relevant issues, you are trying to
sell memberships to inventors for $100, plus $25 a year thereafter.
You are an unknown in our industry, your web site is superficial, and
as far as I can tell you have NO expertise in the field. Even if
you had expertise in Australia it would not qualify you to advise
inventors in North America.
All inventors need to exercise caution when dealing
with service providers. The facts in your specific case make it
clear that even more caution would be in order when dealing with an
unknown like you.
The page you are listed on is the lowest level of
"caution". Your listing there is based on the facts.
If you have any other comments you would like to add to
your new mini section feel free to write.
One last point. You are citing law in your neck
of the woods, but the law in America is somewhat different. The
fact that you initiated contact squarely places jurisdiction on my
turf.
It might behoove you to research American law and
precedent in regards to our First Amendment. There have been a
steady stream of decisions which protect my right as an advocate to
counsel the public about the pitfalls of dealing with people who have
no expertise in our industry.
Ronald J Riley
www.InventorEd.org
Read the Caution Flags List at http://www.InventorEd.org/flaglist/ . Another information source is: Invention Marketing Companies . National Congress of Inventor Organizations (NCIO)
Site Index - Contact Us - © InventorEd, Inc., Page last revised 4-10-2004
|
