InventorEd, Inc. Presents:

Invention Promoter 
Caution List

PLEASE Support InventorEd

Your Donation Helps


America Invents Mini Section - Correction Regarding SLAPP

Click here to break out of Frame

Please Notify Us Of Any Errors Of Fact - Click ErrorOfFact

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Patently Dishonest? - Have you been Scammed? Find out what to do here.

America Invents & Bill Seidel's activities have not to date risen to the level to merit their own page on this site except for the fact that Mr. Seidel has been aggressively working to get his name removed from the caution list.

We try to balance the publics interest with the interests of those who have been employed by in the invention promotion industry.  On one hand people can rise above their mistakes while on the other the public needs to know if a company or person has a checkered  past. 

It most certainly would not be fair to the public to simply suppress negative information and for that reason we do allow those who are listed on the caution lists a chance to have their say (within reason).

The only reason for giving Bill Seidel his own web page in this section is to have room to allow him to explain his side of the story, to display the most important parts of what is known or what inventors have alleged to be their experiences, and to make  Mr. Seidel's comments available so that aspiring inventors can judge for themselves rather or not it is wise to risk their hard earned moneys on America Invents.

Wallet with money flying away It has been widely reported that many companies whose services are of questionable value - or even outright fraud - threaten to sue, and in some cases even threaten to hurt, those who speak out about the problem.  A warning for those who would try to quell free speech in the inventor community.  I work extensively with many journalists and other media.  Any threats, to sue or otherwise, will be promptly passed to the media.  This will get the questionable party much more publicity than this page alone does.

Any company who actually brings a SLAPP suit will be counter sued, and all appropriate information gleaned in discovery will be passed to the appropriate law enforcement authorities.

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

InventorEd had flagged America Invents with a link to our SLAPP warning.  That is not precisely correct.  In fact America Invents did not sue, rather they used the arbitration - mediation process to silence a former client with a gag agreement. 

A year ago (February 2006) Bill Seidel, current president of America Invents contacted InventorEd arguing that he should not be listed on the caution section.  We agreed to review the case and he sent a large packet, mostly fluff of what amounted to testimonials.  Unfortunately the packet lacked contact information to verify the claims and when asked for that information Bill Seidel failed to reply.  So we closed the case, filed all the papers, and took no action due to his unresponsiveness. 

A year elapsed with no communications from Mr. Seidel.  Last week he sent a lengthy letter whining about the impact of the listing on the caution list, especially focusing on the injustice of the SLAPP link, and making a slew of threats from trying to get InventorEd decertified as a nonprofit to litigation.

I found the threat about involving the IRS especially ironic, in that a complaint is just as likely to bring America Invents and those who are associated with it quality IRS attention. 

Since receiving a communication from Bill Seidel we have been reviewing the case in depth.  He is right that it was not a SLAPP per se, but it amounted to the same thing.  America Invents apparently has a mandatory arbitration clause in their contract, and arbitration is handled by a retired judge who apparently has a very cordial relationship with America Invents. 

The case which I was referring to involved an inventor who sent a three page letter to me withdrawing his complaint.  It was very clear that he was very agitated when he wrote the letter, that he had been cowered and that he had been forced to sign a gag agreement.  I called him and started the conversation by asking if his money was returned, and he blurted out NO, but then he continued by saying that he just wanted to put it behind him and that he really could not talk about the case. 

So the bottom line is that I think that America Invents used arbitration in the same way a SLAPP suit is used.  This is a new twist in gagging disgruntled clients which we will now update the SLAPP web page to include.

Any business which has to resort to gagging former clients, which many view as abuse of the process of law,  needs a serious attitude adjustment.  All companies like America Invents need to do to avoid such situations is adopt a contingency fee business model.  If they are as good as they claim, surely both they and inventor clients would prosper with a contingency fee based marketing agreement.


Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

USPTO Published Complaints

Read the Caution Flags List at .

Another information source is: Invention Marketing Companies .

National Congress of Inventor Organizations (NCIO)

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Have you been Scammed?
Find out what to do here.
Please Notify Us Of Any Errors Of Fact - Click ErrorOfFact

Blue bar graphic divides sectins of the page

Return to America Invents Main Page

Site Index - Contact Us - InventorEd, Inc., Page last revised 2-25-2007

Smiley face which turns to a frown

Unhappy Customer

Wallet with money flying away

$10,000 to $20,000 Wasted money

Source FTC Jodie Bernstein